Flightradar24 Blog

Squawking 7700—An Air Traffic Controller’s Perspective on In-flight Emergencies

Squawking 7700—An Air Traffic Controller’s Perspective on In-flight Emergencies

Share this article
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email

Previously we interviewed Captain Ken Hoke to learn how pilots train for and manage in-flight emergencies. Today, on the International Day of the Air Traffic Controller, we turn to a controller for his perspective on emergency situations. The controller we spoke with works at an Air Route Traffic Control Center in the United States, controlling aircraft during their middle phase of flight. His answers to our questions may be slightly different than the answers of a tower or approach controller, but they should provide some general guidelines for how ATC deal with emergencies.

When a flight declares an emergency, how does an air traffic controller respond and how is it different from a normal flight?

It’s very dependent on the type of emergency. A medical emergency with a sick passenger aboard might just prompt a few vectors and phone calls to the sectors that the aircraft will be entering whereas an aircraft with an engine or hydraulic failure will require much more coordination and concentration.

Are all Emergency declarations treated the same by ATC?

In a word yes. It’s not very often you get a heads-up on an emergency aircraft so when a pilot keys up and says, “Center, N123 is declaring an emergency,” it instantly gets your attention and complete focus. As far as actual treatment, no. No two emergencies are the same. The regulations governing ATC communications in the US say to gather enough information to handle the emergency intelligently. As a minimum the regulations recommend getting the aircraft ID, type, nature of the emergency, pilot’s intentions, fuel remaining, and number of people on board. The biggest piece of information is usually the pilot’s intention. Whatever the pilot wants to do, we make it happen. If the pilot needs to turn around and go back to a major airport in the middle of a departure rush, we make it happen. There are times a pilot will accept being vectored into the line of arrivals that already exists as well. That doesn’t mean we’re going to delay him any longer than necessary, but the arrival controllers will make a hole for him fit into.

Does one controller stay with the aircraft the entire time or does the aircraft get passed to different controllers?

Usually no. In the enroute environment, we are usually afforded the luxury of being able to have a pilot change to the frequency of the airspace that the aircraft is flying in. There are a few exceptions to this: An aircraft with smoke in the cockpit might not be able to accept a radio change, because they simply might not be able to see the controls very well. A single piloted military aircraft might not accept a frequency change during an emergency because his/her hands are already full with having to deal with the emergency. With commercial and GA aircraft we usually ask, “can you accept a frequency change?”. During a medical emergency, there’s usually nothing wrong with the aircraft and the pilot can fly and operate the aircraft as they normally would.

What’s the biggest challenge in clearing airspace around an aircraft with an emergency?

This is a very situational question. Not many emergencies will require airspace to be “cleared” at all. If an aircraft is already in a line of arrivals and declares an emergency, there’s might not be much airspace to clear in front of him. The aircraft behind them might be assigned a different runway in case the emergency aircraft cannot clear the runway they landed on. Only one time I can recall having to vector more than one non-emergency aircraft for an inbound emergency. Years ago, a United Airlines Airbus A320 was inbound with an urgent medical emergency from the east, flying directly into an eastbound departure rush. I and the other departure controllers just issued small vectors, either left or right, to make sure the United A320 descended unimpeded. All total, maybe 8 to 10 aircraft got small vectors.

What is the significance of “Squawking 7700”?

Squawking 7700 will get the attention of EVERYONE. Even if you’re flying in approach control airspace, or even uncontrolled airspace, squawking 7700 will force your radar target onto every sector within the ARTCC you are flying. A center controller might ask an approach controller if he’s talking to the emergency code at such-and-such location. Within the en route environment, aircraft will usually not squawk 7700 unless instructed to do so. If there’s a radio failure associated with an emergency, the aircraft might alternately squawk 7600 (no radio) and 7700 (emergency). This alerts ATC that the aircraft is declaring an emergency and does not have an operable radio.

What type of training do controllers receive for emergency situations?

Trainees usually receive training on how to handle an emergency within our radar simulation lab. They are instructed on how to gather information from the pilot and how to respond. There are also many other behind-the-scenes procedures that happen when an emergency is declared that the controller initiates with his/her supervisor as well. Nothing can prepare you for your first actual emergency. I still remember my first emergency while operating a mobile (Army) ATC Tower in Germany. Experience, both time and lessons learned, are the best ways to “train” for an emergency. That being said, controllers are never “alone” in dealing with an emergency. The first thing we do when we hear the pilot declare an emergency is to inform the supervisor, which sometimes just involves turning your head and simply saying, “Hey boss, I’ve got an emergency”. Doing so not only gets his/her attention, but the controllers around you as well, they’ll actively look to see how they can help you out (for example: moving airplanes out of your airspace).

What’s the one thing you would want passengers or people tracking a flight to know about aircraft emergencies?

Don’t assume the the aircraft has, or is, suffering a catastrophic failure of some kind. Get the facts before issuing a “Breaking News” headline on social media.

Featured Image by Morris Biondi.

 

Get the latest aviation news delivered to you

Get the latest aviation news delivered to you

Flight tracking and aviation industry news direct to your inbox

Aviation news comes quickly, so join more than 600,000 others who receive weekly aviation industry and flight tracking news from Flightradar24 direct to their inbox.

Share this article
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email

Useful flight tracking glossary

View our glossary of terms which you may encounter either on our site or in aviation in general that we hope enriches your flight tracking experience.

About Flightradar24

Flightradar24 is a global flight tracking service that provides you with real-time information about thousands of aircraft around the world.
Latest video
Get weekly updates on Flightradar24 and have the latest aviation news land in your inbox.

AvTalk Episode 164: JetBlue vs Spirit 2: this time it’s hostile

How flight tracking works

Flightradar24 combines data from several data sources including ADS-B, MLAT and radar data.
Search the blog
Trending articles
Follow us
Latest AvTalk Podcasts
Related news

Help to grow our flight tracking coverage

We are continually looking to improve our flight tracking and the airports below are where new receivers will add the most coverage. Apply for a receiver today and if accepted you’ll receiver a free Flightradar24 Business Subscription.

Free ADS-B Receiver
Most wanted global airports
Try the full Flightradar24 experience free for 7 days
Remove ads and unlock over 50 additional features

Get the Flightradar24 Aviation newsletter

Flight tracking and aviation industry news direct to your inbox

Aviation news comes quickly, so we want to bring more of the aviation world to you with our weekly Flightradar24 aviation newsletter - On The Radar.