Search

How do aircraft land in low visibility?

Share this article
  • How do aircraft land safely in poor visibility?
  • What are CAT 1, 2 and 3 instrument approaches?
  • What are the criteria needed to fly those approaches?

The weather conditions at airports are often the cause of delays, diversions and cancellations. Strong winds and poor visibility are often the main culprits, and it is only thanks to technologies first developed in the 1970s that modern commercial aircraft can safely land in such conditions. How do pilots land at airports in poor weather, and how do they decide whether to attempt a landing in the first place? Enter instrument approaches.

 

The key to the equation is visibility, specifically the pilot’s ability to see the runway on approach. Visibility can be measured in Kilometers (and sometimes statute miles) in the air, referred to as meteorological visibility,  or meters on the runway (referred to as runway visual range, or ‘RVR). The visibility is the key factor taken into consideration when deciding whether to continue an approach down to the ground. That decision to continue is made at the decision height or altitude. This is the altitude at which the call is made to continue or abandon the approach and initiate a go around. This is measured either as Decision Height – which is the height above ground level (AGL) or Decision Altitude (DA) which is the altitude measured using the pressure setting currently set on the aircraft’s altimeter. If the pilot can not see the runway or lead in lights at that height, they will execute a missed approach, following the prescribed procedure on their approach chart. 

The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) has established a standardized approach category system to define the minimum weather conditions and equipment required for safe and efficient landings. These categories, known as CAT 1, CAT 2, CAT 3A, CAT 3B, and CAT 3C approaches, are crucial in ensuring safe landings, especially during adverse weather conditions. Let’s have a look at the absolute minimum meteorological conditions required to fly these approaches. 

CategoryMinimum Decision Height (DH)Minimum Runway Visual Range (RVR)Equipent required
CAT 1200 feet AGL (above ground level)550 metersInstrument Landing System (ILS) and autopilot
CAT 2100 feet AGL350 metersEnhanced ILS and fail-passive landing system
CAT 3A0 feet200 metersHighly advanced ILS and fail-operational landing system
CAT 3B0 feet50 metersHighly advanced ILS, and fail-operational landing system
CAT 3C0 feet0 metersExtremely advanced ILS, autopilot, and fail-operational landing system

CAT 1 and CAT 2 approaches are most common at airports, while CAT 3 approaches are typically reserved for major international airports and are less frequently used due to their advanced equipment and training requirements. Some approaches may be inherently challenging due to common poor weather events or local geography. The Automatic Landing System installed at the airport can be either ‘fail-passive’ or ‘fail-operational’. In the event of a failure of its redundant systems, a fail-passive system means there is no significant out of trim condition or deviation of flight path but the landing can not be completed automatically. A fail-operational system can still support the approach, flare and automatic landing if its redundant systems fail, hence it is required for CAT 3 approaches. 

Check out a low visibility approach flown down to minimums in our Atlantic Airways trip report.

Where are the world’s CAT 3C approaches?

Whilst some major airports (such as LHR and JFK) and some aircraft are certified to land in what is effectively zero visibility, there are presently no systems available that allow an aircraft to taxi to the gate in such conditions. As such, CAT 3C approaches are typically not flown in practice. The lowest operational conditions are CAT 3B. 

It’s also worth noting that CAT 3C systems can be three to four times more expensive to operate than CAT 3B. 

These categories are vital for ensuring safe landings in different weather conditions. They provide a structured framework for equipping aircraft with the necessary technology and ensuring pilot proficiency to perform precision approaches and landings. The more advanced the CAT category, the greater the level of automation and redundancy required, allowing for landings in progressively poorer visibility conditions.

Cover photo: BAF70, JetPhotos

Update – December 2023

The International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) has updated its classification system for instrument approaches. This has been driven by the introduction of new technologies and techniques, and the proliferation of Performance Based Navigation (PBN) methods. Whilst this has been implemented in an effort to simplify some confusing and overlapping terminology, the categorisation has, in fact, become a little more complex. 

Image: Engineering Pilot

 

Instrument approaches are now initially categorised based on their decision height. A ‘Type A’ approach has a decision height of over 250 feet, and a ‘Type B’ approach below 250 feet.

Type A approaches encompass all the traditional non-precision approaches based on 2D VOR/DME, NDB and LOC sources. They also include ‘Approach with Vertical Guidance’ (APV) approaches. The difference is that this new structure makes it clear that APV approaches are considered to be 3D (but not precision approaches).

This restructure inherently emphasises the prioritisation of PBN-based approaches over conventional navaids and ILS, as the industry moves towards this as the primary means of approaching airports on instruments.  

On The Radar Logo

Get the latest aviation news delivered to you

Get the latest aviation news delivered to you

Flight tracking and aviation industry news direct to your inbox

Aviation news comes quickly, so join more than 1.7 million others who receive weekly aviation industry and flight tracking news from Flightradar24 direct to their inbox.

Share this article
Latest threads
Latest video

Most wanted airport receiver locations

We’re always looking for additional receiver hosts in areas that either lack coverage or need additional coverage. Help us grow the Flightradar24 ADS-B network.

Trending articles
On The Radar Logo
Get weekly updates on Flightradar24 and have the latest aviation news land in your inbox.
AvTalk Logo

AvTalk Episode 317: The (Q1) results are in

Most wanted airport receiver locations

We’re always looking for additional receiver hosts in areas that either lack coverage or need additional coverage. Help us grow the Flightradar24 ADS-B network.

How flight tracking works

Flightradar24 combines data from several data sources including ADS-B, MLAT and radar data.
Search the blog
Follow us
Latest AvTalk Podcasts
More stories
Pakistan has closed its airspace to Indian aircraft. The move comes amid rising tensions following an attack by gunmen in Kashmir and a series…
London City International Airport is located in the heart of London, enabling convenient access to the city for some 3.5 million passengers per year….
On 21 April 2025, an aircraft using the call sign WELCOME was spotted in the skies above Lviv, Ukraine. Unidentified in the Flightradar24 database…

Flight tracking top 10 aircraft

Explore the top 10 most tracked aircraft and find out why these particular aircraft draw so much interest.

Help to grow our flight tracking coverage

We are continually looking to improve our flight tracking and the airports below are where new receivers will add the most coverage. Apply for a receiver today and if accepted you’ll receiver a free Flightradar24 Business Subscription.

Free ADS-B Receiver
Flightradar24 logo
Try the full Flightradar24 experience free for 7 days
Remove ads and unlock over 50 additional features
On The Radar Logo

Get the Flightradar24 Aviation newsletter

Flight tracking and aviation industry news direct to your inbox

Aviation news comes quickly, so we want to bring more of the aviation world to you with our weekly Flightradar24 aviation newsletter - On The Radar.

On The Radar Logo